Oliver Twist Essay
Oliver Twist is an interesting novel in which was written due to the change of life in the late 1830’s. Charles Dickens illustrates Victorian England’s obsession with class distinctions and stereotypes, also portrays anti-Semitism in the 1830’s through the character of Fagin, reveals insight about the workhouses conditions during this time and finally depicts the various forms of thievery that are committed throughout the novel and the role that clothing plays in the various characters identities.
Dickens illustration of Victorian England’s obsession with class distinctions is shown through Noah Claypoles relationship with Oliver. Noah’s parents are destitute and Noah hates all of those who are better off or greater than he is. In doing so Noah Claypole meets Oliver and then enjoys his presence because Oliver being poor and an orphan must be doing worst than he is. Oliver dislikes Noah so much because of the extreme bullying and cowardliness that Noah is constantly enforcing on him. Oliver awoke one morning to only be hounded and made fun of by Noah and the maid Charlotte, Noah goes over board and cracks a disgusting joke about Oliver’s deceased mother and Oliver beats on Noah. . Dickens characterizes Noah's cowardice and bullying as “the same amiable qualities” that are “developed in the finest lord.” Dickens shows that class snobbery is a universal quality, characteristic of the lowest as well as the highest strata of society. Moreover, snobbish behavior seems a component of class insecurity. The poor mercilessly taunt those who are poorer than they, out of anxious desire to distinguish themselves from those who are even worse off in life.
[1]'Let him alone!' said Noah. 'Why everybody lets him alone enough, for the matter of that. Neither his father nor his mother will ever interfere with him. All his relations let him have his own way pretty well. Eh, Charlotte? He! he! he!'
(pg.123, Dickens)
Noah ignorance towards Oliver is portrayed well enough when he insults his mother and father then chuckles with Charlotte. So basically Noah is taunting and being cruel to Oliver to cover up his own insecurities in life. Dickens relates to Victorian stereotypes about the poor asserted that poverty and vice were fundamentally connected and that, moreover, both were hereditary traits: the poor were supposedly bad from birth.
“I thieved for you when I was a child not half his age, and I've thieved for you ever since, don't you know it!”
(pg.123, Dickens)
Spoken by Nancy and this relates to her because she was born into stealing and robbing people of their belongings, and has done it her whole life for Fagin and cannot stop at this stage in her life. She is mentally and physically stuck into that life style, through emotions and thoughts of regret. How could she live the life of a criminal and then want to change her ways? Even though she knows what the right thing to do is she ends up doing the opposite for most for the novel. Also Nancy is madly in love with Fagin’s partner in crime Sikes. She wants to leave him for a life of good but cannot because she has been living this life for too long and does not know how to leave.
Dickens depicts anti-Semitism in the late 1830’s through the character of Fagin, who plays a Jewish thief in the novel. Fagin is ideally a career criminal who takes in young homeless children and makes them in to master mind pick pockets. In accessory to stealing he also is a buyer of stolen goods and he rarely commits crimes on his own he would rather employ people to do the dirty work. Dickens portrait of Fagin displays the influence of anti-Semitic stereotypes.
In this life, one thing counts / In the bank, large amounts / I'm afraid these don't grow on trees, / You've got to pick-a-pocket or two / You've got to pick-a-pocket or two, boys, / You've got to pick-a-pocket or two.
(pg.123, Dickens
Now this quote goes to show Fagin’s evil ways and at times like theses when he sings these sorts of songs to kids is when u realize his pure disgust. Even though Dickens denies that anti-Semitism had influenced his portrait of Fagin you can clearly see that it has indeed influenced his thought and characterization of Fagin. Throughout the novel Charles Dickens continuously refers to Fagin as “the Jew”, which undoubtedly indicate that Fagin’s negative traits are definitely connected to his ethnic identity. He is described in the novel as ugly, simpering. Greedy, miserable. Could this description have anything to do with Fagin’s ethnicity? Another thing is Fagin’s complete and utter disrespect for Nancy and women in general and these teachings are being passed to the boys as well as the other children he takes in, it’s not like he is teaching them anything good anyways. Event though Oliver’s true identity is not revealed during the novel he sticks to what he believes is right most of the time, usually trying to ignore Fagin and get away from him.
‘I'm reviewing the situation / Can a fellow be a villain all his life? / All the trials and tribulations. / Better settle down and get myself a wife! / And a wife would cook and sew for me, / And come for me, and go for me, / And go for me, and nag at me, / The fingers, she would wag at me. / The money she would take from me. / A misery, she'll make from me... I think I'd better think it out again!’
(pg.123, Dickens)
Fagin is singing this while he mutters over his words, once again he is portrayed as a scandalous man, and he is never really portrayed as a good character in the novel which makes you believe that anti-Semitism played a role in the characterization of Fagin
Throughout “Oliver Twist” the are various forms of thievery committed. Examples include crimes like Sikes stealing from Mrs.Maylie, which is essentially a criminal stealing from a respectable person. The second type of crime in the novel is respectable people like Mrs. Mann and Mr. Bumble stealing from the poor. Which is basically still thievery but from two different classes of people. This follows the Robin Hood theme of King John stealing from the poor to feed the rich, but in Mrs. Mann and Mr. Bumble’s case it is the rich stealing from the poor, which is horrible any way you think about it. You can also notice what happens to the individual characters when they are dressed into different clothing. For example when Oliver Twist goes to Mr.Brownlow’s house he receives new clothes which are clean and fresh, and it makes him feel good inside and he starts to behave better while he is there. Until he is captured again by Fagin and his new clothes were stripped off of him and he was given his old clothes back and once again he was in with the criminal crowd.
“Joy and grief were mingled in the cup; but there were no bitter tears: for even grief itself arose so softened, and clothed in such sweet and tender recollections, that it became a solemn pleasure, and lost all character of pain.”
(pg.122, Dickens)
When he was in such a warm environment all of his pain and troubles were washed away and he finally had someone taking care of him who actually cared for him and provided him with the necessities that he required. Also when Oliver went to the country side with Mrs.Maylie and Rose he once again is surrounded by that warm feeling but is skeptical of this new environment.
‘Who can describe the pleasure and delight, the peace of mind and soft tranquility, the sickly boy felt in the balmy air and among the green hills and rich woods of an inland village! Who can tell how scenes of peace and quietude sink into the minds of pain-worn dwellers in close and noisy places, and carry their own freshness deep into their jaded hearts! Men who have lived in crowded, pent-up streets, through lives of toil, and who have never wished for change—men to whom custom has indeed been second nature, and who have come almost to love each brick and stone that formed the narrow boundaries of their daily walks—even they, with the hand of death upon them, have been known to yearn at last for one short glimpse of Nature's face, and, carried far from the scenes of their old pains and pleasures, have seemed to pass at once into a new state of being.’
During this time he felt safe and enjoyed the peace and quiet where he was not forced to commit acts of thievery. Another example of how clothing changed the characters environmental settings or the way that person is seen in society is when Oliver went on his first criminal outing in which he was to steal a richer looking mans handkerchief and Dodger and Charley, the man sees Oliver running away and assumes that he is the criminal. In doing so, charley and dodger start yelling “stop thief” and the just as fast as this is happening an officer pulls of and grabs Oliver and brings him down to the station. Now Fagin gives Nancy order to retrieve Oliver from the station and she is told to pretend to be Oliver’s distraught sister, and she dresses in nice clothing. This just goes to show how the world perceived people during those times, if Nancy would have worn her regular clothing they would not have believed her. Different times call for different measures and in this situation she was to dress like a regular person so she could get back Oliver.
Charles Dickens shows insight about the conditions and environment of workhouses during the late 1830’s. In the novel, Oliver is sent to one of these workhouses where children were abandoned and treated horrible. Sometimes the people were not even fed because the master wants to hold out on them so he can make more money or save more money.
‘So they established the rule that all poor people should have the alternative (for they would compel nobody, not they) of being starved by a gradual process in the house, or by a quick one out of it. With this view, they contracted with the waterworks to lay on an unlimited supply of water, and with a corn-factor to supply periodically small quantities of oatmeal, and issued three meals of thin gruel a day, with an onion twice a week and half a roll on Sundays. They made a great many other wise and humane regulations . . . kindly undertook to divorce poor married people . . . instead of compelling a man to support his family, as they had theretofore done, took his family away from him, and made him a bachelor! There is no saying how many applicants for relief, under these last two heads, might have started up in all classes of society, if it had not been coupled with the workhouse; but the board were long-headed men, and had provided for this difficulty. The relief was inseparable from the workhouse and the gruel, and that frightened people.’
(pg.123, Dickens)
Mr. Bumble is one of the minor church officials at the workhouse where Oliver was born, he is a greedy, careless person who is in charge of these people, and this goes to show really how the conditions were. They work these people to death and barely feed them, which defeats the purpose of having a workhouse.
In conclusion, Charles Dickens depicts the various forms of thievery that are committed throughout the novel and the role that clothing plays in the various characters identities, as well as illustrates Victorian England’s obsession with class distinctions and stereotypes, also portrays anti-Semitism in the 1830’s through the character of Fagin, finally reveals insight about workhouse conditions for the poor during this time.
[1] http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/oliver/study.html, 2008